From the People who brought you “Teabaggers”…

Now, you tell me.

The New York Times offers an editorial about the British Election. It contains a reasonable examination of the most recent election. Nowhere in the editorial itself do they mention the oft used term “hung parliament”. They don’t even talk about the concept, in any terms.

And yet the title they put on the editorial:

They Call It a Hung Parliament

Knowing the Times has many, many gay journalists and editors gives you a clue.

Now you understand why they are publishing misleading articles about the Pope. Now you understand what the motivation is.

Comments are closed.